You are here
Senate Bill 10-191 Policy and Rules
Senate Bill 10-191 established new requirements for Colorado educator evaluation systems and required the State Board of Education to promulgate rules concerning the planning, development, implementation, and assessment of a system to evaluate the effectiveness of licensed personnel.
- Read Senate Bill 10-191
- Read the State Board rules (including sections related to appeals and the evaluation of specialized service professionals) that were promulgated by the State Board of Education
Policy Implementation Guidance
More information to support specific aspects of SB 10-191.
- Learn more about the impact of HB 15-1323 on educator evaluations
- Read the privacy policy for educator data
- Guidance for implementing evaluation systems for educators who perform unique and specialized roles
- Understanding the Non-probationary Implications of S.B. 10-191
- Model Appeals Process Guidance
Historical Context for Rule Development
General SB 191 Rules Approved by State Board of Education in November 2011
CDE presented proposed draft rules to the State Board of Education on June 8, 2011. After holding three rulemaking hearings and receiving written comments over the course of five months, the State Board of Education voted to adopt final rules during its board meeting held November 9, 2011.
- Rules for Administration of a Statewide System to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Licensed Personnel (approved by the State Board on November 9, 2011)
- Power Point Overview of State Board Approved SB 191 Rules
- Timeline for Implementation of State Board Approved SB 191 Rules (Revised March 2012)
To see how the draft rules were revised during the rulemaking process, please see the documents below:
- Comparison of drafts of S.B. 10-191 rules (issued November 2011)
- Draft S.B. 10-191 rules (revised November 2011 version)
- Annotated draft S.B. 10-191 rules (revised September 2011 version)
- Annotated draft S.B. 10-191 rules (revised August 2011 version)
- Annotated draft S.B. 10-191 rules (initial June 2011 version)
To read the written comments that were submitted to the State Board of Education and responses and recommendations from CDE, please see the following documents:
- Letter from State Council for Educator Effectiveness (submitted November 9, 2011)
- Written Comments Submitted October 6 to November 1, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted October 6 to November 1, 2011
- Written Comments Submitted October 5, 2011
- Written Comments Submitted September 23 to October 4, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted September 23 to October 4, 2011
- Written Comments Submitted September 14 to 22, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted September 14 to 22, 2011
- Written Comments Submitted August 25 to September 13, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted August 25 to September 13, 2011
- Written Comments Submitted July 27 to August 24, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted July 27 to August 24, 2011
- Comments Shared during June 14, 2011 Public Meeting
- Written Comments Submitted June 8 to July 26, 2011
- CDE Responses to Written Comments Submitted June 8 to July 26, 2011
- Testimony Presented at June 8, 2011 State Board Meeting (transcripts submitted)
Rules Concerning the Evaluation of Special Services Providers
On May 15, 2013 the State Council for Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) presented its recommendations concerning the development and implementation of a performance evaluation system for licensed education professionals other than teachers and administrators. These special services providers include personnel who provide support to teachers and students in areas that involve student physical, emotional, and social health and well-being.
The SCEE’s report is a companion to the 2011 recommendations on the development and implementation of an evaluation system for the state’s teachers and principals.
The department presented draft rules to the State Board at its July 2013 board meeting and held two hearings to receive testimony on the draft. Final rules were adopted in December 2013.
Rules Concerning the Process for a Non-probationary Teacher to Appeal a Second Ineffective Rating
-
Rules Concerning the Process for a Non- probationary Teacher to Appeal a Second Consecutive Performance Evaluation Rating of Ineffective or Partially Effective (approved by the State Board on April 11, 2012)
To see how the draft rules were revised during the rulemaking process and to read the written comments submitted by the public and CDE responses to those comments, please see the documents below:
- Final Revisions to draft appeals rules (discussed during April 11, 2012 State Board meeting)
- 3rd Revision to draft appeals rules (released April 4, 2012)
- Written Comments Submitted March 24 - 29, 2012
- 2nd Revision to appeals rules (released March 27, 2012)
- Written Comments Submitted March 2 - 23, 2012 and CDE Responses to Written Comments
- 1st Revision to draft appeals rules (released March 1, 2012)
- Written Comments Submitted February 8 to March 1, 2012 and CDE Responses to Written Comments
- Draft S.B. 191 Appeals Rules (initial February 8, 2012 version)
- Cover Letter and Recommendations for Rules from State Council for Educator Effectiveness (submitted February 6, 2012)
Connect With Us