To support districts in their implementation of Senate Bill 10-191, CDE is creating a State Model Evaluation System for teachers. While not mandatory, this system provides an option that focuses on teachers' professional growth and aligns with State Board of Education rules.
The model system has been guided by recommendations of the State Council for Educator Effectivness (SCEE), pilot districts and other Colorado educators.
You can navigate the content of this page here:
Teachers will be rated on Quality Standards that measure professional practice and student learning over time. Teachers will be evaluated on six Quality Standards (view two-page Teacher Quality Standard overview):
- Half of the evaluation will be based on the five Quality Standards that measure professional practice: content knowledge, establish classroom environment, facilitate learning, reflect on practice and demonstrate leadership. The Quality Standards can be measured using the state-developed rubric that identifies the practices necessary to achieve the standards.
- The sixth Quality Standard, student growth, will account for the other half of the evaluation. The standard will be based on multiple measures of student growth or student learning over time, not a single assessment. Teachers must have a team attribution student growth score and at least one individual attribution student growth score. If a teacher teaches a subject that takes the statewide summative exam, it must be used as one of the multiple measures.
Download the Teacher Rubric NOTE: There were no changes to the rubric for the current school year.
The Excel Colorado State Model Evaluation System has been designed to be an easy and intuitive system to help Colorado districts implement the model system. The tool necessitates that the user has access to Microsoft excel 2010 or higher.
Resources Available to ALL users:
- Demo Excel system: This system is designed for demonstration and decision making purposes. Anyone can use and access this system. This system cannot be used for final evaluation purposes because weighting decisions must be made by the district in order to get accurate final ratings. Districts must download and distribute the appropriate “Final” evaluation system to their evaluators with the appropriate weighting that the district selected. The demo should NOT be used for final evaluation purposes.
- Self Evaluation Excel Rubric: This rubric is designed so that teachers can perform a self-evaluation and possibly share this self-evaluation with their evaluator. This rubric only contains the 50 percent professional practices and does not contain the 50 percent measures of student learning.
- Measures of Student Learning Excel Tool: This tool is a stand-alone tool used to help define, weight and score measures of student learning for use in educator evaluations. This tool, by itself, is not designed for final evaluation purposes.
To support fair and consistent evaluations, CDE is developing tools to promote common interpretations of teacher quality. One tool is The Resource Guide for Deepening the Understanding of Teacher's Professional Practices. The resource guide is meant to support Colorado school district employees, administrators and teachers in developing an understanding of the Colorado State Model Evaluation System Teacher Rubric. As individuals apply the rubric to their own teaching and to that of others, the resource guide can support observers and coaches in accurately identifying evidence for the professional practices. The research, examples provided and the glossary can be used to support the development of a common language for Colorado school district employees to analyze, reflect and plan instruction.
The "Measures of Student Learning Guidance" is intended to give districts and BOCES a starting point for determining the 50 percent measures of student learning portion of teacher and principal evaluations. CDE is using pilot experience and overall feedback to improve this guidance over time. To access, visit the Measures of Student Learning Guidance website.
S.B. 10-191 requires that 50 percent of an educator’s evaluation be based on professional practices and 50 percent be based on multiple measures of student learning. Educators will earn a professional practice score based on the rubric and a measures of student learning score based on multiple measures. The professional practices score and the measures of student learning scores are combined to determine an overall effectiveness rating of Ineffective, Partially Effective, Effective or Highly Effective.There are several approaches and methods for combining these measures to arrive at a final effectiveness rating for educators. View information on the approach and method used in the model system for teachers.